The Beacon Hill FYI
House  ·  Senate  ·  Committees  ·  The data

Question on adoption of the amendment 7

S2942  ·  Senate roll call No. 195  ·  2022-06-30 17:01  ·  192nd General Court (2021 to 2022)
9 yeas, 30 nays, 0 absent  ·  the Clerk's sheet (PDF)

Amendment 7, moved by Bruce E. Tarr  ·  Rejected

No diversion for disruption of court proceedings

Mr. Tarr moves that the proposed new draft be amended by striking in lines 13-19 the following:- " provided, however, that a child shall be eligible for diversion if the child is charged with an offense under: (A) paragraph (a) of subdivision 2 of said section 24 of chapter 90; (B) subsection (a) of section 13A of chapter 265; (C) the first paragraph of section 13D of said chapter 265; (D) an offense under subsection (a) of section 13M of said chapter 265; (E) an offense under subsection (b) of section 15A of said chapter 265; (F) an offense under subsection (b) of section 15B of said chapter 265; (G) section 13A of chapter 268; or (H) section 13C of said chapter 268.”

yea · 9

nay · 30

An asterisk marks a vote the sheet records as entered after the roll closed. A member shown as "not linked" is a name on the sheet that did not resolve to exactly one member of the session's roster; it is left as printed rather than guessed.